Skip to content
Astrolune

Validator set

Committee members ranked by final weight, with the components that produced it.

A committee lives roughly ten blocks with about a tenth of its membership replaced each block, so the full set turns over continuously.

Nodes

148

In committee

100

Candidates

30

Median uptime

139d

Committee weight distribution

Both caps are hard ceilings. The share-of-network limit the specification describes is enforced above this layer — and is one of the recorded gaps.

# 1# 148

Weight formula

min(TBS, 10) × min(TGW, 1) × NDM × COD

cap TBS
10
cap TGW
1
min TBS · validator
4
min TGW · validator
0.3
min TBS · candidate
3
#NodeLevelWeightTBSTGWCorrectnessUptimeRegion
55aad2a83aCommittee candidate2.7583.910.7696.29%51dFrankfurt, DE
81f6cdf1c5Committee candidate2.1633.710.5997.22%41dSingapore, SG
84725648dfCommittee candidate2.1483.580.7396.77%36dWarsaw, PL
85a363be59Committee candidate2.1473.710.5896.99%41dBucharest, RO
88de8b9325Committee candidate2.0473.410.7697.50%30dLondon, GB
9135360b1dCommittee candidate2.0023.010.6896.55%20dTokyo, JP
9308aa94c4Committee candidate1.9543.890.5695.71%50dSão Paulo, BR
95cdd69055Committee candidate1.9323.980.5994.15%56dLondon, GB
10519e4ca69Committee candidate1.7253.220.7195.91%25dBucharest, RO
115d0b7e806Committee candidate1.4613.010.6396.72%20dTokyo, JP
1184589bafbCommittee candidate1.4223.150.6897.31%23dNuremberg, DE
1228bc33911Committee candidate1.2273.090.5395.54%22dBucharest, RO
12649e373c8Committee candidate1.0914.660.2498.73%106dTokyo, JP
1271a1e79f9Committee candidate0.9654.450.2697.46%87dDublin, IE
1280dc87bdbCommittee candidate0.9644.470.2596.35%90dFrankfurt, DE
1294b187758Committee candidate0.9325.030.2099.25%153dWarsaw, PL
130c88c3f84Committee candidate0.9123.830.4094.26%48dHelsinki, FI
131c4157b3eCommittee candidate0.8874.230.2396.77%70dLondon, GB
1333d8af566Committee candidate0.8674.910.3099.09%136dFrankfurt, DE
134839f7809Committee candidate0.8534.490.3098.33%90dTokyo, JP
135588397a0Committee candidate0.8414.090.2596.27%61dIowa, US
1369ed2e284Committee candidate0.8393.470.2697.10%32dLondon, GB
1386e8d2a8bCommittee candidate0.7715.090.1999.37%163dAshburn, US
139d0038fb7Committee candidate0.7324.530.2499.00%93dIowa, US
140f5c5c6d0Committee candidate0.6705.250.1798.26%193dTokyo, JP
14119c8713eCommittee candidate0.6594.940.2198.62%141dAshburn, US
14231071957Committee candidate0.5924.920.1698.81%138dMunich, DE
145da5bbb19Committee candidate0.5424.920.1598.34%139dHelsinki, FI
146b7ab78c6Committee candidate0.5143.530.1797.58%34dSingapore, SG
14724ffb985Committee candidate0.4994.580.1598.91%98dAmsterdam, NL
Validator set — Astrolune