Validator set

Committee members ranked by final weight, with the components that produced it.

A committee lives roughly ten blocks with about a tenth of its membership replaced each block, so the full set turns over continuously.

Nodes

148

In committee

100

Candidates

Median uptime

139d

Committee weight distribution

Both caps are hard ceilings. The share-of-network limit the specification describes is enforced above this layer — and is one of the recorded gaps.

# 1# 148

Weight formula

min(TBS, 10) × min(TGW, 1) × NDM × COD

cap TBS: 10
cap TGW: 1
min TBS · validator: 4
min TGW · validator: 0.3
min TBS · candidate: 3

Validator set

All levels Full validator Committee candidate Full / relay node

#	Node	Level	Weight	TBS	TGW	Correctness	Uptime	Region
1	1425811a	Full validator	5.129	5.81	0.94	98.81%	337d	Munich, DE
2	e6d3272a	Full validator	5.057	5.59	0.93	99.01%	269d	Iowa, US
3	e4233087	Full validator	4.730	5.89	0.83	98.83%	366d	London, GB
4	0f5d8c23	Full validator	4.643	5.98	0.88	99.13%	389d	Tokyo, JP
5	f6bdae74	Full validator	4.612	5.92	0.89	99.10%	371d	Seattle, US
6	e297a71b	Full validator	4.344	5.34	0.93	98.31%	212d	Ashburn, US
7	e46dfbe0	Full validator	4.244	5.43	0.83	98.54%	230d	Frankfurt, DE
8	70f362a2	Full validator	4.224	5.77	0.96	98.44%	326d	Helsinki, FI
9	c32f31b0	Full validator	4.211	5.86	0.88	98.82%	352d	Ashburn, US
10	9a7e253e	Full validator	4.070	6.03	0.88	98.98%	402d	London, GB
11	d50679eb	Full validator	4.050	5.24	0.92	99.49%	189d	Ashburn, US
12	19cc15f6	Full validator	4.043	4.19	0.97	98.85%	66d	Bucharest, RO
13	31172004	Full validator	3.963	5.65	0.71	98.37%	289d	Bucharest, RO
14	7f4c6842	Full validator	3.873	4.76	0.87	98.09%	118d	Warsaw, PL
15	bc3b5c61	Full validator	3.848	5.68	0.91	99.43%	295d	Warsaw, PL
16	877f5d95	Full validator	3.829	5.68	0.97	99.15%	296d	Reykjavik, IS
17	104af9ca	Full validator	3.813	4.57	0.95	96.20%	99d	São Paulo, BR
18	ee6a9aad	Full validator	3.753	5.84	0.72	99.32%	347d	Nuremberg, DE
19	493fe3e5	Full validator	3.746	5.50	0.84	98.34%	249d	Nuremberg, DE
20	589fc338	Full validator	3.701	5.30	0.82	99.39%	200d	Frankfurt, DE
21	a0f4b8ec	Full validator	3.693	5.82	0.81	98.42%	340d	Nuremberg, DE
22	777fe042	Full validator	3.670	4.60	0.96	99.21%	99d	Bucharest, RO
23	d0797937	Full validator	3.632	4.72	0.81	99.56%	112d	Nuremberg, DE
24	bc13b416	Full validator	3.603	5.86	0.70	98.71%	353d	Nuremberg, DE
25	28458597	Full validator	3.594	4.32	0.94	94.83%	78d	Amsterdam, NL
26	0e427330	Full validator	3.565	4.27	0.96	95.33%	74d	Warsaw, PL
27	d1efd0bb	Full validator	3.561	5.21	0.78	98.79%	184d	Helsinki, FI
28	1cd29a3d	Full validator	3.555	5.70	0.68	99.27%	299d	Tokyo, JP
29	fb7269be	Full validator	3.545	5.21	0.75	98.39%	186d	Reykjavik, IS
30	547e29a9	Full validator	3.509	4.49	0.83	98.33%	90d	Seattle, US
31	1197139d	Full validator	3.506	5.70	0.66	99.11%	299d	Dublin, IE
32	da56f78a	Full validator	3.452	5.77	0.81	98.89%	323d	Bucharest, RO
33	8ddb90f8	Full validator	3.433	5.82	0.72	99.48%	339d	São Paulo, BR
34	5240c0f2	Full validator	3.413	5.90	0.72	98.95%	368d	Helsinki, FI
35	990f847e	Full validator	3.275	4.72	0.70	99.24%	112d	Frankfurt, DE
36	18597b11	Full validator	3.245	5.75	0.75	99.18%	317d	London, GB
37	e5748daf	Full validator	3.220	5.53	0.68	98.39%	255d	Reykjavik, IS
38	fc02ece2	Full validator	3.215	5.85	0.85	99.36%	350d	Dublin, IE
39	d1ab18c6	Full validator	3.181	4.47	0.72	94.99%	91d	Tokyo, JP
40	59e2bab8	Full validator	3.177	4.62	0.74	99.20%	101d	Iowa, US

View all